To Ring the Bell or Not

A Facebook group member posted an article about no-bell-price. I fully agree with the video posted about him following a person having mobility issue walking on a narrow path. However, a bicycle bell does have its purpose and use. LTA recommends that a cyclist should have a bell. So it does give cyclists a means of alerting others without using verbal alarm.

Before I continue, I will introduce three abbreviations.

1. "AS" - Alarm sound by just ringing the bell once as recommended by LTA.

2. "MS" - Muffed sound made by ringing the bell while holding to the bell so that it makes a clicking sound. This is my own recommendation.

3. "ES" - Emergency sound by continuously ringing the bell.

Basically a bell is for alerting others about pending danger between the bicycle and other users of the road or path. It is not for use by people who just want others to give way because he/she think that they have the right of way and want to zoom pass others.

The Facebook group member wants to show that we should be compassionate about people having mobility issues and thus are very slow and usually blocks the way when the path is narrow. For this, cyclists should just follow behind and let them take their time. 

This also apply to parents bringing children who does not know the danger posed by others. Those parents who have kids with them should restrain their child so that cyclists can safely go pass them slowly.

Two person may be using a narrow path. It will be difficult to overtake them even on single file. Cyclist should be courteous enough to just follow behind them unless they give way. After all, they don't have to walk single file on a narrow path. Usually they will give way if they notice cyclist are behind without being alerted.

There are able bodied people who liked to walk in big groups. They will walk three or four person abreast so that they can chat among themselves. A wide path is not even enough for them to walk on. For these people, cyclist should use "MS" method to let them know others are using the path and is moving faster than them. Kindness Movement Singapore also suggest confronting errant people to let them know what is right and what is wrong. So "MS" is just to let them know that they are blocking others.

"MS" can be used to alert cyclists in front that you are behind them and possibly trying to overtake. A verbal "bike right" is usually more polite.

"AS" should be applied in advance if the path user swing widely left and right. This is especially true for those novice cyclist who just learned how to cycle. However, if the cyclist is really a novice, a "AS" should even make them more unstable. Apply it with caution. 

"AS" can be applied to those who are crossing the path without looking out for cyclists. it cannot be applied to people crossing using the zebra.

For those brazen cyclist who just barge in and out without looking and posing potential accidents, This includes cycling overtaking on opposite path encroaching on your path. "ES" should be used. It should be used sparingly unless it is really a high chance of accidents. Be aware that "ES" may cause irritation to them and is a potential cause of highly charged dialog.

In conclusion, a bell is used to alert others. It is not for you to make others give way to you because you want to cycle fast. A shared path is for all to use and they have the rights to use it. Unless they abuse their rights while ignoring other users, Cyclist should not use bells to cause irritation.

Active Mobility Advisory Panel Recommendation

AMA recommended to reduce cycling speed on footpaths to 10 KPH and mandatory helmet on roads. It provoked quite a stir in the cycling community even resulted in the resignation of a member of the panel.

The reduction from 15 KPH to 10 KPH is probably in view of the increase of accidents between PMDs and pedestrians. It is quite difficult to judge whether it is appropriate as 10 KPH is considered very slow to cyclists. However, if it endangers pedestrians even on 15 KPH, it is for the good of pedestrians.

Dutch cycling rule prohibits cycling on footpaths and walkways. They have the most cyclist population. Their consideration is appropriate to protect pedestrians. However, they have extensive dedicated cycling paths which we are trying to achieve. In view of this, cycling on footpaths and walkways is an alternative but if it cause more injuries to pedestrians, the compromise should be to reduce speed.

I used to commute around and often encounters a lot of pedestrians on footpaths. It is almost impossible to cycle greater than 10 KPH. At times, I have to just patiently follow elderly folks at their speed. I don't advocate using bells to get people to give way. They have the same right to use the path. Moreover, pedestrians do not have "keep left" rule. They can any how walk on the footpath. Often two or more people will give way to both sides and I have to slowly inch forward between them so as not to accidentally make contact.

Obviously, if the footpath is empty then the law should close one eye and allow faster speeds. It should be a responsible cycling style rather than a regulated cycling style.

On mandatory cycling helmets on road. It is a very controversial issue. On the one end it is to provide some form of protection. On the other, it is not convenient for many users. For myself, I always wear helmets regardless. No big fuss about it.

For the Dutch, they have extensive cycling path. Cyclists are mostly shielded from other vehicles. In Singapore, we are just plainly underdogs on roads. Cycling helmet does not prevent accident. It is just trying to reduce injuries for minor accidents. I fell a number of times. If not for the helmet, I probably have a number of head injuries. I don't fully agree with mandatory helmet rule but I do highly recommends wearing one.

Cycling Two Abreast on Roads

Recently the Active Mobility Bill was passed on the second reading. Soon enough there are cyclist who question the reason for the limitation "cycling two abreast will be allowed on all roads with at least two lanes in that direction, except those with bus lanes during the bus lane operational hours".

Now, before we talk about the new bill on this topic, lets just see the existing laws regarding cycling on roads.

The title of Article 7 is "Travelling abreast prohibited". Article 7.1 specifically indicate bicycle cannot ride "on the right of another vehicle". There is no explicit definition of vehicle in the article. According to Oxford Dictionary (and others) it generally means "a thing used for transporting people or goods". It is quite clear cut that bicycle cannot be excluded.

Article 7.2 then restricts Article 7.1 by prohibiting "cycling on the right of any two other bicycles proceeding abreast".  There is absolutely no ambiguity about cycling abreast in this two article.

Unfortunately, those who have bias always ignore Article 7.1 by treating "vehicle" as equivalent to cars, lorries and buses. Furthermore, they read the word "two other bicycle proceeding abreast" as that the law allows two cycling abreast not withstanding that Article 7.1 already prohibits and that it is taken out of context.

It is quite confusing why the specific article mentions two bicycle. It is assumed that overtaking 2 bicycle is still allowed due to the fact that the space taken by two bicycles is small enough. Obviously, those  who are biased towards cycling abreast take it as cycling two abreast is allowed.

Article 7.2 actually refers to the prohibiting of the third third bicycle with respect to the first two (while the second bicycle is overtaking). "Proceeding abreast" was interpreted as cycling abreast. However, "proceeding" could also means "begin a course of action" in addition to "move forward". Anyhow, Article 7.2 is not about allowing, it is about prohibiting and the subject is on third cyclist. Naturally, when you are biased you tends to read the words that conform to you bias instead of open interpretation.

With the biased understanding of "two cycling abreast" being allowed in the old law, they objects to the idea of "putting restrains" in the Active Mobility Bill". They event question why it is not stated in the bill. However, LTA already specifically indicated that it is "key regulation for on-road cycling in the Road Traffic Act".

LTA never specifically explain why cycling abreast is not allowed on certain roads. I have done a bit of measurement and come out with an explanation.

According to an article in asiaone (dated 2012-08-28), Mr. Francis Chu measured the width of roads around Toa Payoh, Ubi and Buona Vista. He concluded that "standard car lane width to be 2.8 Meters" but it can be as wide as "4 Meters".

A bicycle generally measures 0.5 to 0.75 Meter wide. Lets take the shortest width as standard. In order to be safe from swings and water grills on the road, it is generally advisable to cycle just to the right of the double yellow line. That is about 1 meter from the curb side. Now there is a campaign to promote 1.5 Meters safety gap between cyclists and other fast moving vehicles. Assuming, the safety measures are all in place, the total distance that other vehicles must move will be 1+0.5+1.5 = 3 Meters. Even with the widest of road lanes, other vehicles will have to end up partially on the second lane or opposite lane.

If cycling two abreast, then you have to add another 2 Meters (bicycle width plus safety distiance). The total gap (5 Meters) will be wider than any road lane width. Therefore, defining cycling two abreast on "at least two lanes in that direction" is appropriate safety measure rather than restriction.

On single road lanes and bus lanes (multi lanes are not excluded), the safety distance for one cyclist is already 3 Meters. It will be dangerous for other vehicles to overtake. They generally have to go on to the other lane to pass safely. Many cyclist feels the pressure when other vehicles overtook them too close. They do not realize that they have the rights to be on the road so is other vehicles. I do know that it is flesh against steel. Motorcycles also face the same issue. but because their speed is equal to cars, they feel less intimidated because less vehicles overtake them and they are not blocking others.

Cyclists cannot expect other vehicles to follow them because even the slowest speed limit (40 KPH in HDB areas) is also faster than the average 30 KPH that a cyclist can do (except some very good ones). While overtaking bicycles, the other vehicles are also restrained by other vehicles in the same direction or opposite direction. It is inevitable that they sometimes misjudge the safety gap and go uncomfortably close to cyclists. It is not bias on the driver part because they do it to other drivers too.

There are many drivers who question the reason for allowing cyclists on roads. They even say "cyclist do not pay road tax". We can understand their frustration because cyclists used to obstruct their ways. However, cycling on roads are explicitly allowed by law. Cyclists have the right to use roads. It is a matter of accommodating each other.

With the above reasoning, cyclist should be glad that it is now explicitly allowed two abreast on certain roads and not whine about cycling abreast on all roads.

One last thing. Roads are designed for commuting, it is not specifically designed for convoys. Many cyclist like to use the road for recreation/sports in a group. There is no law against travelling in convoys/groups. Remember that cyclists are not travelling faster than other road vehicles which could easily out run them. Out of courtesy, you should consider that they need to overtake you thus try to give way to them whenever possible as a cooperation between road users. There is no law against cycling in groups that does not means you sacrifice other's right to move faster.

I myself am cyclist. I advocate mutual acceptance rather than biased toward cyclists. I do full heartedly support the campaign of having cycling paths on roads. That will alleviate a lot of issues.

Cycling compared to programming

Cycling is like programming. There are several similarities.

Cycling	Programming
Starts with getting a bicycle	Starts with choosing a programming language
Choose appropriate cycling gear	Choose platform, coding tool
Choose a route	Planning programming strategy
Ensure that the route is doable	Ensure that the program can be done
Faces challenges like Sun, Rain, Wind, and Hills	Faces challenges like no library, no functionality, and no capability
Fatigue	Mind block
overcome obstacles like road closure	Overcome program flow issue
Need to rest and refuel with food	Need to take a break
Alert to dangers	Avoid programming loopholes
Friendly to other users	Use comments to make it easier to debug by others
Goes continuously without giving up	Systematic programming step by step
Looking at whats in front rather than how far to go	Look at the challenges on hand and not how many challenges to go
Satisfaction after completion	Satisfaction to see the program working

People on PCN

Recently there have been quite a debate between cyclists and pedestrians going on even ministers are mulling on setting speed limits or reinstate licencing. While I have a lot of arguments for cyclists, I choose to be neutral. The following describes what is the best behavior for both cyclists and pedestrians.

Cyclists

1. Should realize that pedestrians are not well educated on the use of PCN. They treat it like part of a park thus walks without looking out for traffic. So be patient and be alert.

2. Should realize that high cycling speed could cause serious injuries to pedestrians during accidents. So slow down please when there are pedestrians around. Go on the road if you are a speedster in need of speed. PCN is not just for cycling.

3. Should realize that children are ignorant of your presence. Be extra careful when approaching them (especially from behind).

4. Should not be rude to other users as they have the same right as you to use PCN.

5. Should use voice communication as it will unlikely startle pedestrians unlike ringing the bell.

6. Speed if you want if the PCN is deserted. Just be aware that there are blind corners and other speedsters around. PCN is originally designed for pedestrians only.

7. Should realize that even adults may misbehave especially when they are looking at their handphones. They can't hear you if they have earpieces on or having a nice time talking. After all they are enjoying the walk.

8. Should realize that it does not make you a second class user. By being courteous and giving way to others, it makes you a higher class user than them. Yes, you could not cycle smoothly but it ensures that you reach your destination without incident. Think of others rather than concentrate on yourself.

9. If there is a marking for cycling path on PCN, please use it. Nevermind if pedestrians tends to go on cycling path. That problem is a general education issue.

10. Be aware that there are some learners cyclists on PCN. Their balancing are bad. They don't signal. Their control of the bicycle are feeble. Do be understanding as you at one time also behave exactly the same as them.

11. Keep a reasonable gap between you and others. You expect cars to give you 1.5M space. Do it the same to pedestrians.

12. Cycling in a group may be fun but if you cause inconvenience to others. It is bad.

Pedestrians

1. There is no rule on using PCN. NParks does have a basic guide line. KEEP LEFT!

2. Should realize that pedestrians are not the only users. There are cyclists which travel much faster than you.

3. Should look out for fast traffic when making turns or change direction. Others does not have telepathic senses to know what you are doing.

4. When you give way to others please keep left instead of some right and some left making it difficult for cyclists to go pass you.

5. Avoid blocking the complete route when walking in groups. There are faster PCN users who can overtake you easily.

6. Always hold the hand of your children when walking on PCN. They won't know the danger of fast moving vehicles and they won't look out for them.

7. Walk your children/dogs on your left instead of on the right while keeping left. It is safer.

8. Stop playing on PCN. It is for walking. Sudden moves may invite accidents as there will not be ample time for cyclists to react.

9. Stop looking at your handphone or listen to music unless you are just walking straight without crossing any path.

10. Zebra crossing on PCN are supposed to be safe. Don't assume. Look out for errant cyclists.

11. If there are markings on the path separating cycling and walking. Please use the walking path.

If everybody plays their part, there will be minimal arguments or accidents. I won't say there will be no accidents as there is no way you can prevent it. Under unforseen circumstances, accidents do happen.

Bicycle Gears

It is not unusual to see 30 speed gear bicycles. I know various terrains need different gears to climb and if I want to go faster I change gear. What is needed is actually a way to keep constant speed regardless of terrain.

Today's bicycles are all gear centered. When you change gear, you alter the speed and hence the power to drive it. There is a concern about cadence also. Usually, people want to keep constant cadence but once the gear changes, the cadence also changes. It takes quite a bit of experience to keep cadence speed.

Usually I keep the front gear for terrain change and the back gears for speed. Most people just arbitrarily alters it to keep a constant cadence. But I do know novices who simply have no idea which is for what.

I was thinking whether there is a way to keep cadence and speed but alter the power when climbing hills. After all, you need to apply more power if you climb hills. By changing a setting, the pedal lever arrangement changes so that the power transfer will be different. Currently, the gear set at the  pedal does that but it changes the speed also. The gear set at the wheel does exactly the same making it somewhat redundant.

If it is possible to change the lever arrangement without changing the speed then the only thing that changes is the power applied to the gear. It is then easier for the cyclist to adjust to heights by just adjusting the lever arrangement or apply more leg power.

Obviously, there is a need to change speed. Well, the gear set at the back wheel is still available. It is now even easier, If I need speed, I just change the back gear without affecting the cadence.

Whether it is technically possible is another question. This idea is more suitable than current gear set based bicycles.

Scary Moments for a Cyclist

I have been cycling on the road for the past 50 over years. Most of the time it is uneventful. Occasionally there are moments where it bring chills to your mind. The following are some of it.

One car sped past me while I am about to cross a T junction. It turn right in front of me into the side road. I have no choice but turn abruptly and brake hard at the same time. I miss hitting the car just by inches. This is not the only time the exact same thing happens.

On car sped past me on a straight road and cut in front of me then brake hard. Luckily I usually slow down when a vehicle cuts in front of me. That habit save me from hitting it. A lorry did the same thing to me a week or two after a national cyclist was killed by a parking lorry.

I was speeding across a junction. A car driver moves his car forward even though the light has not even change orange yet. The worse thing is that he realizes the mistake and stopped his car right in my path. Again been observant save my skin.

A pickup was moving fast from opposite end and turns in to the left turn lane. I noticed that it is moving fast and thus slow down. That pickup just speed right across me. When I show "what are you doing sign" to it, the person on the passenger seat even mock me.

Countless moments when I cross a side lane of a junction, the vehicle never stops despite there is a zebra crossing. Once I was moving slowly towards the zebra crossing one car speed across it without even pausing. It is just when I was about to cross the side lane.

I am very particular about crossing a T junction. Once I was going straight. A car moves from the side lane towards the junction. He stops at the junction and when I am about to reach him, he zooms out from the junction. I would end up dead if he moves out one second later.

A pickup come out from a side road onto the second lane then turn right into another side road close by without even signalling. If I wasn't aware, I would have crashed right into it.

A bus was making a U turn and since I am already at the point of the turn going straight I did not pause for it to turn. The driver was probably agitated by my action he goes along side me and slowly inches towards me till I had to jump out on to the curb. He then sped away. A very evil person.

A vam is about to turn into a side road then suddenly brakes and stops right across my way. I am expecting it to move in early so I continue speeding and when it brakes, I almost lost control of my bike. It is not the fault of the van driver. A child actually runs across the side road. The van was on the same side of me and I can't see the child so never expects it to brake and stop right there.

Pedestrians never notice bicycles. When they jay walk even when the it is not supposed to (the traffic light already turn red for them), they just cross without looking. It is so often that I always slow down when I see pedestrians waiting to cross the road regardless whether there is a traffic light control.

Once I was on the right side of a car that stopped. A passenger just open the door without looking and I banged right into the door.

A few cars and a bus stopped at the junction. Naturally I go on the left and try to get near the junction. This bus has its door open but is not near the curb. One passenger suddenly jumped out from the bus right into my path. Even though I wasn't speeding, the impact send the guy down onto the floor with elbow bruises. I also lost balance and landed on the grass verge on my back with just minor scratches.

A taxi sped past me and let a passenger alight in front. By the time I reached it, the passenger has already got out of the taxi and it is about to move. Since I am already along side it, I signalled that I am cutting back left. He probably not happy that I blocked him from moving so he sped past me and then slow down near a side road. I noticed that he slow down and assume that he is about to turn into the side road so I just follow behind. Instead of turning he accelerates pass the T junction. I also pick up speed. At the next junction he slow down again. I noticed that he did not even look side ways. So I keep even a longer distance away from him. He did not turn and then drive quickly forward.

I speculate that he is not happy with me and thus want me to go near then make a sudden turn to make me fall over. If he is not sure whether he should turn, at least you can see his head turn towards the side road. It is highly unusual that he only looks in front. He probably look at the rear view mirror to see if I am coming on the left.

One car drive besides me along a road. There is no traffic in front so he should not be at the same speed and just beside me. When going near a T junction,  I purposely slow down in case he make a sudden turn. The car accelerates away.  If I am a girl, it is probably sexual harassment. I would consider this as a malicious act again.

When I cycle from Yishun via Lentor Ave towards AMK. The lane actually leads toward express way entrance. Since there are two lanes that goes into the express, I cycled on the third land.  The next moment a few cars zoom pass me on the left and on the right. The right hand car even cut across my path to go into the express entrance. I also hear a few cars horning at me. I is a truly scary moment. Since then I avoid Lentor Ave and choose Upper Thomson Rd when I am going towards AMK. If I need to go further north to Punggol, I choose Yishun Ave 6 and 7 then Seletar North Link instead.

When going from AMK to Yishun, Lentor Ave have an express way exit with car going at high speed down the slope. At the turn near Mandai road it is difficult to go straight. You have to cut across two lanes. Even after you managed to pass the turning point you end up on a second lane with buses and cars going out on the first lane. End up I always do a stop-look-go way just to cut across the lane. Too much hassle to do it three times on a same road moreover Lentor Ave is always full of speeding cars during rush hours. I avoid Lentor Ave like a plague.

Was cycling on Telok Blangah Rd towards Jurong. Nearing the entrance to Sentosa, There are huge number of cars trying to turn in to it. It is really scary when so many cars trying to cut in front of you to turn left.

I was going uphills and there is a turn right on top of it. I made a turn then realized that there is a oil spill on the road but is too late to avoid it. Sustained a large bruised skin on the back and elbow.

Of course not all cars behave the same way. There are plenty of courteous cars,buses and lorries who give way to me even though they have the right of way. Some even encourages me on.

A more scary experience is actually pedestrians and cyclists on PCN. You see inconsiderate cyclist speeding and shouting for you to give way. You see pedestrians blocking the way, making turns without looking, suddenly step into the PCN, children on bicycles makes sudden turns, novice cyclists lost their balance, illegal ebike user zooming in and out etc. I have lost count of how many times such incident occurs. It is even more stressful to cycle on PCN than on the road.

Once I was on Mandai PCN during the raining season. It was not raining on the day I rode on the PCN. I saw a tree branch so I turn my handle a bit and the result is I see myself sliding on the floor. Luckily there is no serious injury. A few weeks later my cycling group also go on to Mandai PCN. 8 of them fell along the way some had bad cuts. It is all because the PCN is covered with algae.

Despite all these scary moments, it does not deter me from cycling. Accidents does occur. Due to my extra vigilant caution, I have avoided major injuries. These incidents tells me not to be complacent when I go on my bike.

A case of two cyclist again

Was cycling on Upper Thomson Road towards the East. This cyclist on a MTB was cycling on foot path. I am cycling on the road. I am travelling at 28-30KPH. Overtook him after SLE. Did not notice till I slowed down at a slope. He was trying to catch up.

He was on a MTB and on footpath. I was on a hybrid and is on road. There is no way he could catch up as it is impossible to go fast on footpaths. Unlike the previous case, I have no hindrances to slow me down. He has plenty. Anyhow, he could not play tag with me as I am simply too fast.

There is only one instance where he actually catches up. After I am aware of his efforts. I simply keep at 30KPH and he could not even be seen. He finally managed to catch up when I stopped at traffic lights at Yio Chu Kang Rd. I don't know whether he turned off or stopped after that. As it is down slopes after the junction, I go easily at 32-36KPH till Ang Mo Kio Ave 1 where I slow down and turned into it.

Cycling on footpath at over 20KPH in the early morning is dangerous as the footpath is not designed for cycling and visibility is poor. Even cycling on PCN has its many dangers already. I do not want to encourage him to speed so I make it impossible for him to catch up rather than allow him to play tag with me at my my usual slower pace.

A Case of two Cyclists on PCN

The scene started at the junction of Hougang Ave 7 and Tampines Rd. I stopped at the road junction. This guy with a Dahon came up besides me. The first thing he looked at is my bike. Well, nothing to look at. I am having a cheapo bike.

At the start of the Serangoon PC, he starts to overtake me. Looking at the speed he is going, he probably travel at well above 25KPH. Since the PC is quite empty, I start to give chase. After a while I caught up with him and noticed that he travels at 30KPH.

It is not normal I go at the same speed when there are other users on the road so I slowed down whenever there are pedestrians along the way then speed up to catch up.

He is keenly aware of my presence and keeps looking back at me when I am very near him. Interestingly, he did not try to shake me off. I never have intention to overtake so I just keep a short distance behind him. So we keep playing tag on and off till Ponggol way via PPN PC.

I had to stop at the street crossing for safety reason. He just crossed it without even pausing. On Serangoon Way, he did the same. Since I am going onto Serangoon Way, I do not intend to keep up again. We parted way from there.

He is young and on a branded fast bike. I am old with a average hybrid bike and a bag of tools. There is no way I could overtake him and keep it that way. It is simply too dangerous to race on a PC. I just want to see what he can do with a nice bike like that since he have an "atas" look when he first encounters me.

Cycling map in Singapore

Go to the map directly at https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/view?mid=zYN7CFn96k94.k5NpSMlBEPvI

Nice and Easy RI

Usually cycling trips are not my choice to write blogs on. This one is an exception as I take it easy to enjoy the surroundings. The original plan is to go or my route "RI on mostly PCN". Since Ulu Sembawang PC is closed till middle of the year, I decided to just cycle around the Island and try to go on PCN as much as possible without planning the route in advance.

The trip started at 6.30 AM. At this hour, the PCN is still dark where there are no lamp posts. However, I am going on the PCN routes from Woodlands to Yishun. The whole route is beside roads. It is very unusual for me to go on PCN at this hour. Usually I prefer to start at 7:00 AM or later.

I am quite surprised that there are quite a lot of people use PCN to commute to work or school. At this hour, there are many people using the PCN thus I really have to slow down to accommodate them. Most cyclists go much faster than I do as I am in no hurry to go places.

Upon reaching Yishun, I noticed a flower on a Handkerchief Tree. Its the first time I saw the flower.

I used the Khatib Bongsu PC instead of the one that leads to Yishun Ave 1 as I intend to bypass Lentor Ave. There is much less people using the Khatib Bongsu PC. The ride is quite enjoyable.

Since there is no PC that connects Yishun to Punggol or AMK, I used Yishun Ave 6 instead. Yishun East Park is just at the road side in this road. I decided to detour into the Park. Unfortunately, there is a "No Cycling" sign in the park. This is one of a few parks that is not cyclist friendly.

There are Pulai trees grown in the park.

On exiting the Park, I continue on to Seletar North Link via Yishun Ave 1. The road is quite empty at this hour. Since it is Monday already, there isn't any Angler visible at the Reservoir. Usually I would speed up at Seletar North Link, but this time I just take it easy and go with a much slower pace. I called it 'No Sweating Cycling'.

Instead of going into Punggol Waterways, I decide to turn left to the northern PCN instead. That was a huge mistake. The PCN is currently paving new metaled paths. Many parts of the route have temporary paths but was not compacted enough for cycling or walking. I ended up going on the grass patch instead. Quite bumpy as I am on a high tyre pressure bike.

Took a 'leak' and took a picture of a Lily flower at Punggol Point Park.

Heard previously that Coney Island will be open next year. Can't wait to use the new path. For now, I just have to be patient.

I passed by Lor Halus Wetland several times but never go in. From the look of it, there is nothing much to see. However, this time I just make a detour to confirm what I think. Well, I am right. There are indeed some plants but not special enough to attract my attention. I could have missed some as I am on my bike and the path is rocky. I need to pay more attention to the path than the plants.

Used the path near Pasir Ris Farmway 3 to go to Pasir Ris Dr 3. Its dry season so the path is much easier to cycle through.

Took a detour into Pasir Ris Park via the underpass near Blk 505. It is a PCN I have never gone through before. Cruise around the park for a short distance before exiting at Pasir Ris Close then back to Pasir Ris Dr 3. There is another exit further down in the park but is more difficult to maneuver and I can't remember how to do it.

Since is is Nice and Easy RI, avoided the hill at junction of Pasir Ris Dr 3 and Loyang Way. Instead took the path Near Pasir Ris Primary School to cut across to Loyang Dr. However, since it is the first time I go by this road to Changi, I got confused and turn out to Loyang Ave near Tua Pek Kong Temple instead of further down to Loyang Way. Anyhow, the climb is very much shorter and lower at Loyang Ln.

Following PCN, I took the longer path to Changi Village. Had brunch at Changi Village then continue to Changi Beach Park. It is getting hot now but I still refused to move faster. Took a leisure ride all the way down to East Coast Park.

At the ECP, this Asoka tree is simply too beautiful to miss.

Further down, I was amazed at the Flame tree's bright red color. Unfortunately, the flowers are way too high to take a nice picture of the individual flower.

I have never go across the bridge over Ford Rd. This time round I decided to explore a bit and pushed the bike across. This bridge is quite old. Some parts are creaky and rusted. The path at the other side ends near MCE. According to news the path joining to GBB East will be completed in 9 months time. It took that long to build a path that is less than 1 KM? I am amazed.

Since the path is a dead end, turned back and exit to Ford Rd via the heavy vehicle car park. Use the Tanjong Rhu Rd to go to GBB East.

At GBB East I tour around the north side of the park and took quite a number of pictures. It is now too hot to tour the south side of the park. Below are some of the nice flower pictures.

 Duranta white

Duranta

Spatoglottis

 Blue Twilight

 Asystasia Rose Pink

 Chinese Violet

 Trumpet Flower

 Giant Potato flower

Cape Honeysuckle

Shrubby Lespedeza (bean family)

Bitter-wood

Going over the bridge to GBB West, I came across this small Cupey de Monte flower. Made several tries before successfully taking the picture despite the strong wind.

Found a Praxelis plant further down. It is a nice blue cluster of flowers.

The Sandpaper Vine flower is the liveliest one I ever took.

The white Thunbergia flower looks nice too.

This Donkey Ears flower is quite difficult to find. I passed by this path several time and this is the only time I see it. It belongs to the Stonecrop family (Crassulaceae).

You can't imagine how tall is a Agave flower till you see it.

The Love & Peace sculpture is still as bright red as ever. A woman just walked into the picture but I am too lazy to retake.

Water lilies grows abundance in ponds at MBS. This two are some of them.

Got a bit confused at the Promotory end up having to dismount and push bike near One Fullerton as there are "No cycling" sign boards. My GPS also goes bonkers around this place.

Crossing the Fullerton Bridge, I cruise along the Singapore River. Have to dismount and push through the various underpasses. Saw a few bust of famous persons erected there. It must be new as I have not seen it since I last passed by.

The construction at Kim Seng Road is still on going thus has to detour to the path behind Kim Seng Plaza. Go on River Valley Rd till it cuts across the Singapore River again where  I can access to Alexandra PC. Along the PC, I caught sight of a Oriental Pied Hornbill eating grasshopper. There were a number of children crowding near the bird but it simply ignores them and continues its business.

From then on, the cycling is very much routine and dull. I went all the way down to Jurong East via PCN then to Bukit Batok. It is here that I notice a Purple Heart (without its beautiful flower). The flower only appears early in the morning. This is the last plant picture of the day as I am already too tired to detour to the parks. Moreover, I have to make it to Woodlands before it gets dark.

Going via PCN all the way till Pang Sua PC. It is the fist time I go without GPS guidance and still never get lost. At Pang Sua PC, I have to go on to Woodlands Rd. It is here that I start to chiong a bit around 30 KPH till the hill near Kranji Mrt. Go back on PCN after Marsiling MRT for a short distance before exiting at Woodlands Ave 5. Too lazy to go on the longer distance via PCN to Republic Poly. The trip took almost 12 hours. Distance is just 110 KM.

Did not use WikiLoc for the whole distance. I only use it at GBB to get geocode of the plants. Later replace the trail with the Endomondo one thus there is no waypoints in the map. My Android phone camera goes to sleep and turn off GPS at the same time. So I use WikiLoc to keep the GPS awake when taking picture with WikiLoc.

The WikiLoc Map is here.
The full Picasa Web Album is here.

Crossing a junction on bicycle

Crossing a typical junction (with side lanes) is quite simple on road. You just need to be aware of cars turning into the side lane when approaching. You will also need to be aware of impatient cars that will cut across your path at the first half of the crossing. After crossing, you will need to be aware of cars coming out from side lanes. Meanwhile, always keep a lookout for cars behind.

Crossing the same junction from a PCN is a quite different game. Upon approaching the side lane, you need to watch out for traffic from the front, left and right of the pedestrian walkway, behind,  and cars coming in to the side lanes. You will also need to look carefully on the ground for uneven surface as many such crossings are not as smooth as you think. Try to cross the side lane at junction between Sembawang Ave and Camberra Link on PCN in the direction towards Camberra and you will know what I mean. The short ramp is almost 45 degrees. You will even have to be aware of falling tree branches if it rains.

Upon reaching the island at the junction you will need to look out for traffic coming to and from the right if that corner's Green Man light is on.

When it is time to cross the road, you will face with another problem if the number of people crossing is big. The pedestrians usually ignores your presence. You will have no choice but to cycle at their speed. The keep to the left rule is almost non existing. People can cross you on the left and right. They can also change sides without notice. They can even stop to decide which way to go right in your path. It is generally not polite to ring your bell if the crowd is big. They don't actually bother that much about the Red Man turning on once they started.

Pedestrian crossings are designed such that you are given about 30 seconds or less to cross. On some busy roads, LTA have to install a card reading device for elderly people to tap their card to extend the time a bit more. Generally, the time starts when Green Man light is on. If you miss the short time frame, You will have to wait for the Green traffic light to Red. Then wait for the turning light to turn Red, Then wait for bus exit light (on some bus interchange exit) to turn red. Finally, you have to wait for the opposite traffic light to do exactly the same before the Green Man Light will turn on. I can tell you, on some busy roads or crazy junction this may take a few minutes just for your slot of  less than 30 seconds. It is, after all, a road crossings isn't it.

On reaching the other island of the junction, you must be aware that there are people who will change their direction to cross over to the other road. They will just turn towards it without noticing your presence. Worse of all, they will just stop there blocking your way. Unlike pedestrians, we can't change direction easily thus there is no way to cycle around them on the island like other pedestrians. We are unhappy that they block our way, they are unhappy that they have to move for you. It is a lose-lose situation.

Ok. You finally reach the last section of the crossing. You will still have to worry about traffics from pedestrian walk way and PCN coming towards you. As there is no distinct divide of the path, they can come from all directions. Also you will need to be aware of cyclists and pedestrians changing their path in front and behind you. Finally you will still have to be aware of cars on the side lanes ignoring your rights. Please do not forget about the condition of the path way. The pathway for PCN are usually painted brown. It is much harder to distinguish the curb from ramps. There is a particular spot near Yishun that have so many scratch marks on the curb that you wonder how many bicycles mistaken that it is a ram and try to go near it and then realize the mistake.

After one such crossing, you will get so tired that you will loathe the next couple of crossings to come.

Life as a Cyclist in Singapore

This is a third person description of a cyclist who lives in Singapore. Up till now Singapore still does not have cycling lanes on roads. As such he has to live a life on edges. Motorists can cut across his path because he is slow. Motorist can squeeze him out of the road by edging close till he hits a drain grail gap on the road or simply push him out of the road. Motorist can harass him by running parallel to him for no reason. If he raise his hand to signal, he is in danger of being hit on the hand as motorists can zoom pass him at close quarters. The 1.5 Meter gap guide is virtually non existing. Motorists can claim that he is transparent at a blind corner. All kind of reasons to make him feel intimidated on roads.

Earlier on, there is virtually no opportunity to cycle on pedestrian paths. It is still illegal to cycle on pedestrian pathways except in Tampines. At a certain time in history, he gets a respite because NParks create PCN that allows cycling. Upon trying, he get a shock. The speed limit is 15 KM max. He must dismount to push across bridges. He even have to push across road crossings where he had to share with pedestrians. He gave up and continues to cycle dangerously on roads.

The condition does improve any better when the Immigration check points were migrated. Now Causeway check point is on BKE. He still can access to the Immigration by going via Woodlands Center Rd but at busy hours, all traffics are directed to the express way. The worst is the Second Link. He cannot even try. He concluded that it will no longer be a good cycling experience to cross over to the neighbor country for a cycling tour.

After a while, a minister officially acknowledge that cyclists can cycle across pedestrian crossings that is part of PCN but must do so discretely so as not to endanger others (http://www.mha.gov.sg/news_details.aspx?nid=MTU5MA%3D%3D-FQsQbvrhWsU%3D). He is also shocked to find that there is a fine of $5000 and a one year imprisonment for cyclists who are rash in crossings while motorist only gets $1000 and 3 months penalty. He also noted that reckless driving by motorist only incur $3000 and one year imprisonment. He began to wonder which mode of transport is more lethal. He reads that there are 18 cyclist deaths each year on average. He wonders how may dead pedestrians caused by cyclists.  He has lost count of how may times a motorist speed across the side road crossing despite that he already stopped at the crossing. Meanwhile the penalty of cycling across some bridges increases from $500 to $1000.

Even with the heavy fine, he decided that he should try the PCN. Upon trying, he discovered that cycling on PCN is not as easy as he though. There are places where the path is very wide and cycling is smooth. There are also some places where the path can be narrower than the width of his bike. At other times the path is so uneven that it feels like going on a roller coaster ride. He was shocked to see some path ends near road with right angle turns into a small lane or there is a pillar right in the center of the path. He is also sick of having to go around bus stops with right angle turns and sign boards right in the path. According to some, it was said that PCN are originally design for pedestrian only. It is only extended to cyclists as the distance get further and further.

After cycling through most of the PCN, he is sick of the NParks web site that shows the PCN routes. It is simply not user friendly. He has to zoom in at the right place to see the route. He need to find the route name to get to the route. He wonder why he has to get the name first rather than seeing the route first. He find it hard to plot a route from one place to another with that web site. Finally, he gave up and plotted the whole route with annotations on Google Map. With that, he could plan a route much easier. He called his map PCN on Bikes (https://mapsengine.google.com/map/u/0/edit?mid=zYN7CFn96k94.k5NpSMlBEPvI).

As he has gone through most of the PCN, he began to notice a lot of designs that is not really mean for cyclists. He got so sick of such inefficient design that he blogged about it in Blogger (http://jnhiew.blogspot.sg/2013/03/is-pcn-really-for-cyclists.html). A Facebook group founder in a cycling group suggests him to show the exact issues by photos on a smaller stretch of route. He decided to try on the Woodlands Yishun route. As a result he produces 22 pictures where he think it can be improved (https://picasaweb.google.com/106611639464075912591/PCNIssues). He also wrote to NParks on the suggestion of the leader. NParks did respond to the mail. However, after 6 months, there is nothing done to improve the situation.


He then decided that he will go on PCN only when he is tired or in group cycling events. In this way he could cycle slowly without being very alert of motorists. He accept the remarks by a co founder of a group that PCN are 80% full and 20% empty. He don't want to treat it as useless unlike many of his fellow cyclists.
Recently he accept the request of the cycling group to try the URA Master Plan cycling route. He tried 4 of them. One out of 4 of them has many dismount and carry/push. He sigh again but realize that the route is really difficult to plan as it goes through places where the infrastructure does not give alternatives. He sadly accept the fact. One route goes through the Kallang Bishan PCN. He is relieved that there is something done to bypass the many dismount and carry along the Kallang river. He used to go on the route and find that he is usually the only one doing that. He beliefs that most cyclist snubs this route.
On and off he posts some PCN discrepancy on the cycling group's page. It usually attracts much comment and jokes about it. He did had a long exchange of words with a proponent of the bad design. He was wondering on which side the proponent is standing. Another proponent came in with similar remark and even say that the road crossing design is better. He really cannot stand such remark so he do a Google Street View on the route to see if that remark is true. It turned out that there are 5 similar crossings in the same route. 4 of which is joined with pedestrian crossings before crossing the road. The one in contention is actually quite far from the pedestrian walk way and that there is another pedestrian crossing (very near HDB block) near by. He thus concluded that the route is cut off not because of good design. It is just a poor design that does not consider the cyclist.
The master plan will not be complete till a number of years later. Meanwhile, he wonders whether he could live long enough to see it. He does hope that with the number of cyclists increasing, the government will do something to cater to the needs of cyclists.
It really strikes him that he know he has all the rights to use roads. Some how some motorists say he cannot use it because he did not pay road tax. Sadly to say that these ignorant motorists will only be forced to acknowledge the wrong view when he gets injured by them. And the worst thing is, he may not even live to see justice served when he gets killed. Talking about rights?

Bicycle Path design

I have jokingly posted in FB on a bad design of a cycling path. It is about crossing on a carpark entrance. The design requires user to dismount and push across the road as there is no ramps lining both sides. A few others join in the fun by giving funny answers on how to cross. We were just having fun talking about it.

There is this proponents of the design who actually think that this is an acceptable design and chides us for being wanting to be "spoon fed". He wants us to live with it.

Since we were not that serious about criticizing the design, the post is not a welcoming message. As I started the posted, I am compelled to respond. I brought out the fact that it defeats the purpose of a cycling path if we cannot cycle on it. It is the fundamental reason for a cycling path.

I also point out that if a cyclist have to do it many times, cyclists will get weary of it. The proponent said that he has done it many times and does not have any effect. I pointed out that it will have an effect after a long cycling trip with many of this obstacles.

The proponent then deviates and ask me how "pedestrians cross the road". I bring the subject back to focus by saying that cyclist have to behave like pedestrians when crossing the road. There is no need for an extra step to dismount just to cross the road.

The proponent again criticizes the mention of "extra step". He then ask for the reason for "having no ramps but have pillars". He is obviously just based on the picture I posted. I draw example from PCN paths and point out various places where there are no pillars but have ramps. I also point out that some PCN have ramp and pillar too.

The proponent then switch the focus to "misuse" of the fact of no pillars. This is actually out of the point as I actually started with "no ramps" issue only. I simply pull the subject back to focus by relating the design to cyclists only.

The proponent then mix motorist and cyclists together and focus on misuse. I refute the contention and bring out the point that PCN does not have such protection on both too. I then challenge him to take the proposed route by URA from Punggol to City and comment about the number of obstacles need to go through. He avoided the challenge and say that I deviate from the point of contention.

I corrected him that my post is not just about one single issue. It is about the general design of cycling routes. In actual fact, I posted a long list of issues in PCN quite some time ago and have recently posted two separate issues on cycling paths.

The proponent agrees about the misunderstanding of the purpose of the post but still stress that it is not an issue. Obviously I also stress that one or two such obstacle is not an issue until you have to do a number of it at one time.

The proponent then suggest to avoid the obstacles. I pointed out that this is totally contrary to the purpose of having a cycling path.

The proponent then tries to soften the impact by saying that money is not an issue and that its use is more than just for cyclists. I don't want to point out the fact that this is a "dedicated cycling path" to him. I just concentrate on the bigger issue about "money is not an issue". I pointed out that it wastes tax payer's money and shows the world what Singapore can do with this type of design for cycling.

The proponents then goes quiet. Meanwhile others continues to joke about it. Surprisingly, another proponent posted a message saying that the design is better than another and that we should accept it.

I really find it hard to accept such baseless suggestion. I looked at Google map street view on the whole stretch of the cycling path in the specific area for the similarity of design. I found 5 crossings within the same route with all of the routes crossing carpark entrances from main road. Four of them joins to pedestrian crossing before crossing the road. The particular obstacle is a bit far from the usual pedestrian crossing where other paths join. There is also another pedestrian crossing close by but is very near the building.

I concluded that it is more difficult to join to the usual pedestrian path so the designer simply terminates the cycling path. It also does not makes no sense to have three crossings on a short stretch of the road.

II then reply with my findings to show that the particular design is not better but simply convenient decision by the designer without considering the cyclist. The second proponent did not respond.

The first proponent then rudely say that it is a wast of breath talking (in Cantonese spelled in English). Obviously I cannot take this comment lying down. First I agree with him that it is "a waste of breath" because he did not see out point. I also hinted that by agreeing with the designer, he is actually encouraging more bad designs.

Both proponents then fell silent. I will also give the case a rest until some proponent starts to suggest otherwise.

Please do not take it that I am a die hard opponent to dismounting on cycling paths. It is very much more difficult to design a cycling path on an existing infrastructure. I do accept that some dismounting crossings are inevitable as it may not be viable or economical to make life easy for cyclists. However, if there is a way to make life better for cyclists then due considerations should be made.

This particular issue is actually not an acceptable design. There are plenty of spaces available around the entrance to join the cycling path to the pedestrian walk way. I can live with having a "dedicated cycling path" sharing with pedestrians. I simply cannot accept that a "dedicated cycling path" requires cyclists to dismount because the designer decided that it is easier to design that way.

Cycling Rules

A set of rules were implemented for all cyclists in Singapore. This rule will govern the behavior of the cyclists. Rules are actually for the good of the cyclists. However, humans tends to take it as inhibitions. The result is that they will conveniently ignore the rules and do it their own way. This results in a number of extra accidents due to errant cycling.

Rules are good only if they are observed. It is pointless to talk about rules when people do not want to observe it. On the road, groups of cyclists tends to block the road regardless of faster cars behind them. They charge the red light thinking that they are king of the road. They shout at other slower cyclists to give way to them. They go on the middle of the road.

On the cycling path, they zoom regardless of the speed limit. They scream at people blocking their way. They speed pass you without warning. They ignore the pedestrian crossing. They ring their bells as if they are the only ones that have rights. etc.

Even when we observe the cycling rule on the road there is no guarantee that we are safe. Motorists cut across your path dangerously. They horn at you because you are slow. They go dangerously pass you at close quarters. They harass you by going side by side with you for no reason. They even tried to squeeze you out of the road by going nearer and nearer to you. Some are so malicious that they speed pass cyclists and then suddenly stops in front of them

All these happens despite there are rules. Luckily not many people does it this way. I see motorists tailing cyclists instead of passing them dangerously. I see motorists patiently let cyclist pass by on their right. I see motorists wave cyclists on despite they have the right of the way. I see motorists encourages cyclists to go on.

Rules does not govern every aspects of cycling. What if there are gray areas. For example, both cyclists and pedestrians have the right to go on PCN. PCN rules are quite straight forward. Speed limit is 15 KPH and always keep to the left. They don't say how many person can go side by side. They don't tell you how you should behave with other people around you.

There are lots of people who do not know what to do on PCN. It applies to cyclists and pedestrians alike. Pedestrians are not aware that they are sharing the road with cyclists. They tends to go in big groups. They walk in the middle of the path., They are not aware of faster moving users behind them. They do not know how to behave when cyclists approach them in front or behind. They often split up their group by going on the left and right when cyclists approach them thus making it more difficult for the cyclists. They do not respond to bells to give way. They cross from one side to the other without looking out for cyclists. They walk on cycling paths when there is a pedestrian path just beside it.

Cyclists on the other hand does not act kindly to pedestrians. They ring their bells as if they are the only one that have rights. They do not slow down for other path users. They are rude to other users. They also go in groups instead of single file. They speed on the path.

My conclusion to cycling rules is that we should follow the rules and waive our rights to facilitate other users. If the road is congested, by all means give motorist the rights to move on faster. Give way and wave them on if possible. Use hand gestures to show your appreciation of them. Keep a keen lookout for wayward motorists. Don't show your anger at them who do not follow the rule.

On PCN, just be patient with ignorant path users. They may not even know how to behave with cyclists around. Try not to ring the bells unnecessary. Use verbal gestures if necessary. Follow them till there is an opening for you to pass. Do not be angry at those who do not give way or block your way.

East Parks

This trip is to make up for those smaller park that I did not visit in my previous trips. The distance required to go through all the parks is quite long thus I changed to cycling activity instead.

The first park to visit is Green Oval. There is no plants that interests me in there.

The next park is Brontosaur Park. It sounded like a Dinosaur park to me but I am very disappointed that it has nothing to do with Dinosaurs. Many stainless steel sculpture are in the park. As I am not really interested in the man made things, I skipped all that without taking a single picture as there are no interesting plants available. On exiting the park, I came a cross a play ground with a Dinosaur toy in it. it is a Triceratops. Well, at least I get to take a picture of a Dinosaur.

I have visited Pasir Ris Town Park before but have not gone through the part of the park that is in my route. I had to go through it anyhow as this park is right in between the previous park and the Atlantis Park. Unfortunately, it is a fruitless detour. No picture of interest is taken.

Sea Shell Park has a sea shell theme. However, it is still man made and there are no interesting plants available. I go through it empty handed again.

Pasir Ris St 21 Park is a small park. It is just not my day. I took no digital image of the plant there.

Park Aquaria is yet another of the small parks. No luck here too.

I finally found one worthy plant while cycling on a cycling path. It is a Forget-me-not.

My happiness soon turn to disappointment. The cycling path cuts across a HDB car park entrance but it is not suitable to cycle across the road. The curbs are not slopped. This is again another obstacle by the designers. The foot path on both sides of the path are slopped (just 10-20 meters away). Why they design a cycling path like that is a mystery.

The disappointment caused me to lost track of direction and end up going around in a HDB Carpark. Finally, managed to get hold of myself and is able to continue on the path.

After crossing a pedestrian bridge, I saw this small Morning Glory growing on the barrier of the bridge. Could not get a nicer picture because I forget to bring my L27.

Along the Park Connector, I saw this White Dillenia. A very large flower.

I skipped the Eco Park and Sunplaza Park as I have gone through them in previous trips. 

Tampines Central Park gives me at least one chance to take a picture. It is a Peregina, a very common but nice plant.

I have gone through Bedok Town Park before. I had to go through it again as it is the only way to avoid going on roads.

There are small gardens in the park. I took a picture of a Panama Rose. It is too blurred thus I don't want to show it here. Instead the picture of a White Adler nearby is still acceptable. The Android camera just cannot focus on the right thing or maybe I get too close to the flower.

The exit of the park is blocked by construction. I had to use the sheltered walkway along Bedok North Road as there is no way to cross the road except the overhead bridge which I cannot access.

Took a picture of a Betel nut palm (I think). Google suddenly decided to make it "Awesome" by changing it to a GIF with animation. I actually don't care about the awesomeness of GIFs.

The last park has no name. I found a tree planted by a big shot minister. It is a Cook Pine.

The route plan has a big flaw. Part of Kaki Bukit Ave 1 is closed for construction. Took a big loop around to go to Eunos Rd. The trip ends at Eunos Rd.

The WikiLoc route map is here.

The Picasa Album is omitted as most pictures already appeared here.